« Home

Naturality cannot be given by a family of isomorphisms [math-000S]

This is came from when I'm formalizing lemma 1.3.11 of Basic Category Theory, I miss a precondition (HH below must be a natural transformation in the lemma) and try to prove an impossible thing.

Let F,G:CDF, G : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{D} be functors, and a family

H:(X:C)FXGXH : (X : C) \mapsto F X \cong G X

Does HH must be natural?

Counterexample. [math-000T]

The result is HH can be not natural.

This counterexample is given by Zhixuan Yang:

Let C\mathcal{C} be the two-object one-arrow category, and D\mathcal{D} be SetSet , and

F,G:012id2F, G : 0 \to 1 \mapsto 2 \xrightarrow{id} 2

where 22 is the two elements set. For 00 we choice H(0)=idH(0) = id and H(1)=notH(1) = \text{not} , then HH is not natural.