This is came from when I'm formalizing lemma 1.3.11 of Basic Category Theory, I miss a precondition ( below must be a natural transformation in the lemma) and try to prove an impossible thing.
Let be functors, and a family
Does must be natural?
Counterexample. [math-000T]
Counterexample. [math-000T]
The result is can be not natural.
This counterexample is given by Zhixuan Yang:
Let be the two-object one-arrow category, and be , and
where is the two elements set. For we choice and , then is not natural.